![]() Publication decisions : The editors at Journal are responsible for deciding which of the articles submitted to the journal should be published. ![]() Any kind of unethical behavior is not acceptable, and Editorial board do not tolerate plagiarism in any form.Īuthors submitting articles to journal affirm that manuscript contents are original. The journal is dedicated to following best practices on ethical matters, errors and retractions. Our ethic statements are based on COPE’s Best Practice Guidelines for Journal Editors. It is necessary to agree upon standards of expected ethical behavior for all parties involved in the act of publishing: the author, the journal editor, the peer reviewer and the publisher. PUBLICATION ETHICS AND MALPRACTICE STATEMENT Reviewers advise the editor, who is responsible for the final decision to accept or reject the article.Ģ. Revised manuscripts might be returned to the initial Reviewers who may then request another revision of a manuscript.Ī final decision to accept or reject the manuscript will be sent to the author along with any recommendations made by the Reviewers, and may include verbatim comments by the Reviewers. The Editor’s decision will be sent to the author with recommendations made by the Reviewers, which usually includes verbatim comments by the Reviewers. In rare cases for which it is extremely difficult to find a second Reviewers to review the manuscript, or when the one Reviewer’s report has thoroughly convinced the Editor, decisions at this stage to accept, reject or ask the author for a revision are made on the basis of only one Reviewer’s report. Should the Reviewer’s reports contradict one another or a report is unnecessarily delayed, a further expert opinion will be sought. The time required for the review process is dependent on the response of the Reviewers. ![]() Language correction is not part of the peer review process, but Reviewers may, if so wish, suggest corrections to the manuscript. Reviewers are asked to evaluate whether the manuscript: – Is original – Is methodologically sound – Follows appropriate ethical guidelines – Has results which are clearly presented and support the conclusions – Correctly references previous relevant work. Whenever possible, Reviewers are matched to the paper according to their expertise and our database is constantly being updated. The journal employs the double-blind peer review process, where both reviewers and authors remain anonymous throughout the review process. Those that meet the editorial policies and a minimum quality level are normally passed on to at least 2 experts for review. ![]() Manuscripts rejected at this stage are insufficiently original, have serious scientific flaws, have poor grammar or English language, or are outside the aims and scope of the journal. It is rare, but it is possible for an exceptional manuscript to be accepted at this stage. The Editor first evaluates all manuscripts. Reviewers in the relevant research area assess submitted manuscripts for originality, validity and significance to help editors to determine whether the manuscript should be published in the journal. Peer-review is the system used to assess the quality of a manuscript before it is published. Publication Ethics and Malpractice Statement.Pharmacognosy and Phytotherapy Research Lab,ĭepartment Of Pharmacognosy And Pharmaceutical Botany, B.Pharm, MSc – Pharma Med, MBA (Marketing), PGDM, PGDMM, DIM
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |